KEEP THE HORTON GENERAL |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
THIS IS A HISTORICAL ARCHIVE OF OUR SUCCESSFUL 2008 CAMPAIGN.If you are looking for the current threat, please click here for the current home pageArchive continues from this point WE'VE DONE IT!VICTORY FOR BANBURY!All of Banbury is celebrating today, as the ORHT's unsafe and inhumane proposals have been rejected at the highest level. In an amazing victory of common sense over bureaucracy, the Secretary of State has followed the IRP's recommendations and thrown out the hugely unpopular proposals. Campaigners celebrated the news with an impromptu victory march through the town and up to the Horton, meeting delighted staff on the maternity and paediatric wards. Campaign chairman George Parish, elated by the news, said "We desperately need safe children's and maternity services in Banbury. We're just over the moon that we've still got them. We can't thank everyone enough for all the effort they've put in to save our services. Lives WILL be saved as a result of this decision!" The IRP's report included 6 recommendations which the ORHT must follow. While they accept that services will have to change at the Horton, the IRP clearly stated: "The
IRP does not support the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals (ORH) NHS Trust’s and "The Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust (PCT) should carry out further work with the ORH NHS Trust to set out the arrangements and investment necessary to retain and develop services at the Horton Hospital. Patients, the public and other stakeholders should be fully involved in this work" You
can read the IRP's report, appendices and press release here: We'd like to say THANK YOU to the members of the IRP, who have taken the time to really listen to the people of Banbury, understand our situation and, we believe, reached the right decision. Where do we go from here? Basically, the IRP have told us the result they expect to see - the retention of paediatric services, obstetric services and SCBU - and are leaving it up to the PCT, ORHT, and stakeholders to determine the right way to do that. We're looking forward to playing a full part in that process. THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO'S HELPED US WIN THIS FIGHT Too
numerous to name at this time; but particularly to our long-suffering
families, - from everyone on the Keep the Horton General Committee Visit the excellent Banbury Guardian website for coverage of the events of 20 March 2008 - video of our victory march, and the ORHT's Trevor Campbell Davies' reaction; and comments from the major players in the fight to retain our essential services. _________________________________ RECENT DEVELOPMENTS We have recently become aware of a key document that should have been provided to all the stakeholders, a Transport Briefing Paper. Amongst a lot of new information, it reveals that 1,800 children per year are expected to need ambulance transfer to the JR, rather than the ORHT's previously stated figure of "just" 700. Some areas of the site will still reflect the old figures as we are pushed for time finalising and presenting information to the IRP.
Our report to the IRP Read our report to the IRP here Our
report to Lord Darzi review on the future of the NHS Ambulance Transfer times Recent statistics, obtained by KTHG from the South Central Ambulance Trust, have revealed just 6 out of 417 ambulance transfers in the last 18 months reached the JR in less than 40 minutes. Forty minutes is how long the ORHT told the public a transfer would take - until we proved them wrong with our recent Ambulance Trip (below) The
shocking figures show that from June 2005 to November 2007 there
were 417 transfers, 321 of which were 'urgent' and 96 'emergencies' Unlike the ORHT, who based their risk assessment on just "bed to bed" times, the Ambulance Trust figures are all-encompassing. They start the clock at the moment the ambulance is called, continuing through how long it takes the ambulance to arrive at the Horton, how long it takes to load the patient for the trip, and the journey itself, only stopping the clock when the patient arrives at the JR. You can read our supplementary report to the IRP on ambulance transfer times here NEWS & EVENTSThere's so much happening - please see the links below to make sure you don't miss any important recent developments! Can you REALLY get from Banbury to Oxford in 25 minutes? IRP Chairman appeals for the public to speak out The statistics that prove we need full services at the Horton Childrens' nurses come out fighting Health Secretary says "20 miles is too far" Meet the campaigners at the Banbury Christmas Lights event Campaigners join 7,000 others in national march "Save the Horton" facebook group signs up over 800 members in first 24 hours Tony Baldry leads Commons debate Top Medics oppose downgrading of children's services Royal College of Midwives opposes downgrading at HGH Success as proposals are referred to Secretary of State
________________________________________________________________
Can you REALLY get from Banbury to Oxford in 25 minutes?
We left the Horton at 8.25am on a Thursday morning in term time. Traffic was light, as commuters have to leave well before this time to arrive at their desks by 9am. The weather was fine and clear. The only traffic queue was the almost permanent one from the Marston Flyover to the JR. In short - as good driving conditions as you could hope to get on this route. It took us 1 hour and 5 minutes to get to the JR. Even if we had been allowed to use the blue lights, our experienced ambulance driver told us that the fastest he could have got us there was 35 to 40 minutes. In fact it would take even longer as the patient would have to be prepared for transport and wait for an ambulance to become available at this end, and later be received at the JR. To put this in context -
What really brought it home to me was comparing the progress of our trip with my own labour 2 months ago. Born just 40 minutes after labour was established, my daughter would have been delivered just past Sainsbury's in Kidlington, by my husband, without even gas and air to help me through. Medical and public opinion is united - it is essential to retain consultant-led maternity and 24/7 paediatric services in Banbury. Only the ORHT think otherwise. Now we must convince the IRP. Please, please take 10 minutes to write to the IRP right now.They are our last chance.Read the full report of the ambulance trip here IRP chairman appeals for the public to speak outIn an open letter to the people in the Horton's catchment area, IRP chairman Dr Peter Barrett has called for anyone with new information, or who feels that their voice has not been heard, to speak out. Read Dr Barrett's letter here. The statistics that prove the need for full services at the Horton36 - the number of days between June and mid November 2007 that GPs were asked to divert all Acute cases to the Horton - because the JR couldn't take them. 87
- the number of times, between January and October 2007, the Horton's
children's ward admitted children from the JR, because the JR was full. 34% - the projected increase in the population of the Cherwell Area in the next 15 years (CDC) Indeed, several GP practices in Banbury are closing their books because they cannot cope with the influx of new patients. 20 - the number of miles the Health Secretary was heard saying was "too far" for a pregnant woman to travel to get the help she needs 23.2 - the number of miles from the Horton to the JR 900 - the number of "Horton" women, per year, who would be booked to deliver in Oxford under the proposals (ORHT to Banbury Town Council) 160 - the number of high risk, mid-labour transfers predicted by the ORHT every yea r (ORHT consultation document)
700 - the number of children needing urgent transfer from Banbury to
the JR, every year (ORHT consultation document) Children's
nurses come out fighting
|
|||||
Links: Horton victory - everything about our successful campaign |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |